Showing posts with label bloggers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bloggers. Show all posts
Sunday, September 02, 2007
Sex, Suffering and Virgil
The mysterious Man Who Is Thursday has an incredible post on all of the above.
Thursday, August 09, 2007
The Workers Control the Means of Procrastination!
Blogging may or may not be capable of overturning the dictatorship of capital, but it is pretty darn good at making fun of dumb ideas like a bloggers' union.
(Via Fourth Checkraise)
(Via Fourth Checkraise)
Friday, July 20, 2007
Is Law Cool?
I wouldn't have thought so. But Omar Ha-Redeye is trying to prove otherwise with his new group blog for Canadian law students. Encourage him!
Monday, July 09, 2007
List of Canadian Blawgs
Vancouver Law Librarian Blog has a very useful, and frequently updated, listhere.
Monday, July 02, 2007
Parental Discretion is Advised
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
University of Alberta Law has a blog
Here. We can only hope it won't be as bad as the godawful U of T one.
Russell Brown reflections on the SCC's record in private law is mordantly amusing, and reminds me of an undergraduate paper I did on the liar's paradox. What is the law when the highest court says P, ~P and "P is consistent with ~P"?
Russell Brown reflections on the SCC's record in private law is mordantly amusing, and reminds me of an undergraduate paper I did on the liar's paradox. What is the law when the highest court says P, ~P and "P is consistent with ~P"?
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
John Wiley & Sons reaches for the hammer
Via Razib, I see that John Wiley & Sons is engaging in some heavy-handed (and dubious) copyright enforcement against a science blogger.
It seems that Wiley's Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published some taxpayer-financed research showing that mixing alcohol (and some other less interesting substances) with fruit may improve its shelf life and antioxidant qualities. Shelley Batts, one of Seed's collection of bloggers, published a chart from the article in the original version of this post.
The result was this letter:
I'm not really up on intellectual property law at all, let alone American copyright law, and I hesitate to opine as to what the law is (as opposed to what it would be if I had the dictatorial powers necessary to straighten things out.) But even if Wiley is within its legal rights, it should have to pay something in its reputation for this. The whole academic publications business survives on a business model of nothing but path dependence and inertia. To heck with them.
Update: Wiley has folded, blaming the misunderstanding on a junior staffer.
It seems that Wiley's Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published some taxpayer-financed research showing that mixing alcohol (and some other less interesting substances) with fruit may improve its shelf life and antioxidant qualities. Shelley Batts, one of Seed's collection of bloggers, published a chart from the article in the original version of this post.
The result was this letter:
Re: Antioxidants in Berries Increased by Ethanol (but Are Daiquiris Healthy?) by Shelly Bats
http://scienceblogs.com/retrospectacle/2007/04/antioxidants_in_berries_increa.php
The above article contains copyrighted material in the form of a table and graphs taken from a recently published paper in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. If these figures are not removed immediately, lawyers from John Wiley & Sons will contact you with further action.
I'm not really up on intellectual property law at all, let alone American copyright law, and I hesitate to opine as to what the law is (as opposed to what it would be if I had the dictatorial powers necessary to straighten things out.) But even if Wiley is within its legal rights, it should have to pay something in its reputation for this. The whole academic publications business survives on a business model of nothing but path dependence and inertia. To heck with them.
Update: Wiley has folded, blaming the misunderstanding on a junior staffer.
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Der Untergang des Blogosphere
The Globe and Mail points me to this article claiming that October 2006 represented the peak of blogging. Since then, there has been more exit than entry. Soon enough, Josh Marshall and Instapundit will be one with Nineveh and Tyre.
Those of us with a Tory bent will find this comforting. A reactionary's hobbies should not be cutting edge. In an earlier time, such a scruple might have kept the Tory from all kinds of fun. But the contemproary globoculture makes everything a matter of antiquarian interest quickly enough. A generation ago, it would be necessary to affect an interest in Early Music or the Odes of Pindar to be considered a genuine fuddy duddy. Now, it is sufficient to be an expert on The Clash or to care about the merits of the Clinton impeachment.
Those of us with a Tory bent will find this comforting. A reactionary's hobbies should not be cutting edge. In an earlier time, such a scruple might have kept the Tory from all kinds of fun. But the contemproary globoculture makes everything a matter of antiquarian interest quickly enough. A generation ago, it would be necessary to affect an interest in Early Music or the Odes of Pindar to be considered a genuine fuddy duddy. Now, it is sufficient to be an expert on The Clash or to care about the merits of the Clinton impeachment.
Thursday, January 11, 2007
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
Very Silly Person Watch
The intelligent libertarian bloggers have correctly determined that Ann Althouse is a very silly person, and very much not worth talking to.
Pith & Substance has already been on the case, although I can't claim to have devoted as much time to it as these people.
Pith & Substance has already been on the case, although I can't claim to have devoted as much time to it as these people.
Friday, December 01, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
