Here. We can only hope it won't be as bad as the godawful U of T one.
Russell Brown reflections on the SCC's record in private law is mordantly amusing, and reminds me of an undergraduate paper I did on the liar's paradox. What is the law when the highest court says P, ~P and "P is consistent with ~P"?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment